How is the credibility of assignment results generally measured?

The credibility of assignment results is primarily measured by the intended use. This means that the results must be appropriate and reliable for their specific application, whether it's for tax assessment, market analysis, or investment decisions. The criteria for evaluating the credibility are closely linked to how the results will be used in practice; for instance, a result deemed credible for tax assessment may not hold the same weight in a corporate merger scenario.

In this context, while statistical analysis is a powerful tool for assessing data and results, it serves as a method rather than a measure of credibility in itself. Similarly, market trends and value fluctuations can provide context information, but they do not directly assess how credible the assignment results are for a specific intended use. Therefore, understanding the intended use helps ensure the assignment results are valid and reliable, producing outcomes that decision-makers can trust.