Is it permissible to use instructions from an attorney as a basis for a jurisdictional exception?

The correct perspective is that it is not permissible to use instructions from an attorney as a basis for a jurisdictional exception. This is grounded in the principle that jurisdictional exceptions typically require a clear and consistent framework established by law or regulation, rather than relying solely on the guidance or instruction of an individual attorney.

Using an attorney's instructions can introduce ambiguity and potentially conflict with established legal standards. Jurisdictional exceptions often involve significant legal implications and need to adhere strictly to statutory guidelines or judicial interpretations to ensure fair and consistent application of the law. Legal standards are designed to limit discretion and promote uniformity, so decisions shouldn't be made purely based on an attorney's advice or instructions, which may be subjective and context-specific.

Therefore, adherence to established legal frameworks rather than relying on the instructions from an attorney maintains the integrity and consistency of jurisdictional determinations.